One filing error.
Months lost. Sometimes more.

Four agents. Every case. Trained on the specific failure modes of your practice area — so the error gets caught before it reaches your desk.

0

AI agents

0

QA checks per petition

0+

Scenarios validated

0

Critical flags exported unresolved

No sales call. No migration. Works alongside the tools you already use.

General-purpose AI. And Flock.

H-1B PETITION · I-129
QA scan in progress
Visa classification
Employer · EIN
SOC code · worksite
I-94 · status
LCA wage · DOL check
$13,000 deficiency
General-purpose AI has no access to DOL wage data. This deficiency goes undetected without Flock.

General-purpose AI knows the law in general.

It cannot tell you the prevailing wage for SOC 15-2051 at a Texas worksite. It does not track form edition changes. It does not know what the Texas Service Center flagged last quarter.

f
Legal
Documents
Paralegals
Case mgmt
QA Layer
Form filing
Law firm

That is not a capability gap. That is a context gap.

Flock knows the prevailing wage for every SOC code and worksite. It tracks form edition changes automatically. It flags what generic AI misses — before the petition reaches your desk.

$0

wage deficiency caught before filing. Not after.

An H-1B petition for a Senior Machine Learning Engineer at a semiconductor employer. The LCA wage: $142,000. The prevailing wage for SOC 15-2051 at the Texas worksite: $155,000.

A $13,000 deficiency. Enough to trigger a mandatory denial under INA §212(n). Enough to cost the beneficiary their status, the employer six months of delay, and the attorney a conversation they did not want to have.

This is not a rare case. LCA wage deficiencies are among the most common grounds for H-1B denial — and they are entirely preventable. The data is available. The check is straightforward. It just requires a system that runs it every time, on every case, before the petition leaves the office.

That is what the Flock QA agent does. It checked this case. It caught the deficiency. The petition was corrected before filing. It was approved.

Four agents. Every case. Each one trained on what goes wrong.

Intake Agent

Core capabilities

  • Listens to attorney-client calls in real time — no notes, no transcription work, no missed details
  • Extracts 20+ case-type-specific fields automatically, so the data that reaches your forms is verified, not typed from memory
  • Generates a document checklist matched to the case type and jurisdiction — nothing missing before the file opens
  • Sends a branded intake confirmation to the client, reducing the back-and-forth that delays every case
See intake in action
video call · intake
LIVE
SL
Sarah Lin
Attorney
AS
Arjun Sharma
Client
F
flock· Open intake agent

Every area of law has its own
failure modes. Flock knows them.

From immigration petitions to dissolution filings, Flock agents carry the domain context that prevents the errors specific to each discipline — before anything reaches the attorney.

Immigration law

47

Checks per petition

H-1B, AoS, removal defense, and family-based petitions.

LCA wage deficiencies
Superseded form editions
Family law

31

Checks per matter

Dissolution, custody, support, and domestic filings.

Jurisdiction-specific form errors
Conflicting dates across filings
Estate planning

18

Checks per document

Wills, trusts, powers of attorney, and beneficiary coordination.

Conflicting beneficiary designations
Incomplete asset schedules
Criminal defense

24

Deadline categories

Felony, misdemeanor, plea agreements, and appellate matters.

Trial and motion deadlines
Plea agreement inconsistencies
Real estate

22

Document checks

Residential, commercial, leasing, and title matters.

Contract and contingency date errors
Disclosure requirement gaps
Employment law

19

Filing checks

EEOC charges, wage claims, and settlement agreements.

Statute of limitations errors
Wage calculation inconsistencies

The check your malpractice insurance wishes you ran.

432

QA checks across immigration practice

15

case types instrumented

8

check categories per petition

0

critical flags exported unresolved

IntakePending
DocumentationPending
Form fillingPending
QA layerPending

 

H-1B wage deficiency · SOC 15-2051 · Texas worksiteAoS + expired I-94 + cross-jurisdiction filingPERM audit trigger · prevailing wage level mismatchO-1A · extraordinary ability · evidence gap flagL-1B · specialized knowledge · employer-employee relationshipEB-2 NIW · national interest · prong three documentationTN · degree field mismatch · SOC code inconsistencyNaturalization · continuous residence gap · criminal record flagDACA renewal · advance parole + pending AoS conflictCustody + high-net-worth + multi-jurisdiction assetsH-1B wage deficiency · SOC 15-2051 · Texas worksiteAoS + expired I-94 + cross-jurisdiction filingPERM audit trigger · prevailing wage level mismatchO-1A · extraordinary ability · evidence gap flagL-1B · specialized knowledge · employer-employee relationshipEB-2 NIW · national interest · prong three documentationTN · degree field mismatch · SOC code inconsistencyNaturalization · continuous residence gap · criminal record flagDACA renewal · advance parole + pending AoS conflictCustody + high-net-worth + multi-jurisdiction assets
What attorneys say

Built for the attorney who cannot afford a second look.

Flock caught a wage deficiency on our third H-1B filing. It would have been a denial. We have not filed without it since.

SL
Sarah Lin, Esq.
Lin Immigration Law Group

Flock caught a wage deficiency on our third H-1B filing. It would have been a denial. We have not filed without it since.

MR
Marcus Reid, Esq.
Reid Family Law

Flock caught a wage deficiency on our third H-1B filing. It would have been a denial. We have not filed without it since.

JK
Jenna Koh, Esq.
Koh Legal

Quotes are placeholders. Real attorney feedback collected during beta.

We watched a $142,000 LCA deficiency reach filing. It should not have.

Flock was built by a team with backgrounds in immigration law, legal operations, and AI infrastructure. We spent time inside immigration practices watching how work actually moved — from intake call to filed petition — and we saw the same failure patterns repeat across every firm we talked to.

Not because the attorneys were careless. Because the tools they had were built for workflow management, not error prevention. Clio tracks your cases. INSZoom stores your forms. Nothing checks whether the wage on the LCA matches the prevailing rate before the I-129 goes out the door.

That is the gap Flock fills. We started with immigration because it is the practice area where errors are most objectively verifiable and most consequential. We are building into every area of law for the same reason: every discipline has failure modes that are knowable in advance and preventable with the right context.

The agents do not replace attorney judgment. They make sure attorney judgment is applied to the right problems — not spent catching errors that a system should have caught first.

No migration. No rebuild. No new workflow.

Flock does not ask you to abandon the tools you use. It connects alongside them. If you are on Clio, stay on Clio. If you use INSZoom, keep using INSZoom. Flock handles the intelligence layer — extraction, drafting, form filling, QA — and exports clean files back to your existing system.

Add Flock to an active case in under 10 minutes.

Works with Clio

Your case management stays exactly as it is.

Works with INSZoom and Docketwise

Form outputs export back into your existing system.

Works with your current intake process

No new client-facing tools required.

What Flock catches.
What Flock does not touch.

What the agents do

Flock extracts, cross-references, and validates. It checks every field against its source — LCA wage against DOL data, form editions against USCIS current versions, A-Numbers against their own prior appearances in the file.

Every output is logged with a scenario ID, the check that triggered it, and the source it referenced. Nothing is inferred. Nothing is assumed. Every flag has a citation.

What the agents do not do

Flock does not file. It does not submit. It does not communicate with USCIS, opposing counsel, or any court on your behalf.

It does not give legal advice. It does not interpret ambiguous facts. It does not make judgment calls. Those belong to the attorney. Every output Flock produces is a draft or a flag — never a decision.

Who is responsible

The attorney reviews every Flock output before it goes anywhere. The attorney decides whether a flag is material. The attorney files.

Flock is a tool. The license, the judgment, and the liability stay exactly where they belong — with the attorney of record. That is not a disclaimer. That is the architecture.

Priced for small practice. Built for the cases you cannot afford to get wrong.

Start with 10 free cases. No credit card. No sales call. Cancel any time.

Find your plan

Cases per month8

Pro

15 cases included — most popular

$14/case overage

$199

Starter

$99 / month

5 cases per month

Solo attorneys and small practices getting started

  • All four agents across supported practice areas
  • Intake, documentation, form filling, QA
  • PDF export
  • Email support
Start free

Pro

$199 / month

15 cases per month

Growing practices with consistent monthly volume

  • Everything in Starter
  • Priority processing
  • Custom document templates per practice area
  • Slack support
Start free

Firm

$349 / month

35 cases per month

Multi-attorney firms or high-volume single practices

  • Everything in Pro
  • Multi-user access
  • Custom QA rules per practice area
  • Dedicated onboarding
Talk to us

Need more cases? $18/case on Starter, $14/case on Pro, $10/case on Firm.

How accurate is Flock?

Flock's QA checks are based on objective, verifiable rules — prevailing wage tables, form edition currency, document completeness requirements. These are not judgment calls — they are facts the system checks deterministically. For drafting and documentation, every output is flagged for attorney review. Flock does not produce final work product. It produces reviewed work product.

What happens if Flock misses something?

Flock is a tool that supports attorney review — it does not replace it. Every output requires attorney sign-off before it is used. If an issue passes through the QA layer and an attorney does not catch it on review, the responsibility sits where it always has — with the attorney. We work continuously to improve check coverage. Known failure patterns are added to the check library as they are identified.

Does Flock work for practice areas beyond immigration?

Yes. Immigration is the first area with full agent coverage. Family law, estate planning, criminal defense, real estate, and employment law are in development. Each practice area gets purpose-built context — not a relabelled general model.

Does Flock replace my case management system?

No. Flock connects alongside Clio, INSZoom, Docketwise, or whatever you use today. No migration required. It handles the intelligence layer and exports clean files back to your existing system.

Is client data secure?

Yes. Data is encrypted in transit and at rest. Flock operates under a Data Processing Agreement. We do not train on client data. Attorney-client privilege architecture is maintained throughout.

What happens when a form edition changes?

Flock updates automatically. You will never file on a superseded edition. Form currency is maintained as a system responsibility, not yours.